Cup comments
Well, the World Cup is moving along, with the semifinals beginning this week. Maybe I'm the only one who felt this way, but I think it's hard to believe that the World Cup has been going on for two or three weeks already. I, for one, find it very exciting to wake up in the morning and have such world-class soccer on right away. I think it's great to watch such elite athletes excel at their game. With that, here's my thoughts on the game so far. Read on for insight, or repeat it to friends or co-workers to sound like you've been paying as much attention as I have.
The Good: Some absolutely brilliant play by some of the greatest players to ever play the game. Did you see the Maxi Rodriguez goal? Blasts the ball far post from the edge of the penalty area after playing the ball off his chest? Disgustingly amazing. Or Lahm blasting in the first goal of the tournament from the edge of the box? Epic. Goalkeepers are saying that this ball is more difficult for them to read, but that is making for some fantastic goals.
The Bad: The U.S. getting knocked out of the competition at the group phase. Granted, I think their group was the single toughest group in the event, but they had a real chance to progress going into the last game against Ghana. The U.S. was killed by cards and fouls, though, and crashed out early. I'm not going to cry for Bruce Arena's head like some pundits (ahem, Eric Wynalda), but something about the team needs to change. The philosophy, the lineup, the coach, something has to give. To lose a hard-fought game is one thing, but to lose while looking like you're playing a friendly is another (ahem, Czech Republic game).
The Ugly: Of course, it's the officiating. Sixteen cards in the Portugal/Netherlands game? Something is amiss there, that's just unreal. The ref must have thought he was being paid by the card. I'm tired of seeing cards and whistles blown; if this game gets any less-contact, it's going to be baseball. Let 'em play. And don't get me started on the US-Italy game. The Italy red card was a legit red card, the two US ones weren't. And that's unbiased.
Biggest Surprise: France. Where did they come from? Granted, the talent is there. Barthez, Henry, Viera, and the great Zidane, they should have cruised. But they didn't. They looked about as excited to be there as the U.S. did, and they barely made it out of the group stage, but then they pull out a result against high-flying Spain, and stun Brazil. I don't really care for France for reasons I don't know, but I have to give credit where it's due. They're hot at the right time.
Biggest Disappointment: England. OK, I realize that they got to the quarterfinals, but with the squad they have, they should have made the finals. They have incredible talent on that team, but I think they're horribly mis-managed. Their manager, Sven-Goran Eriksson, had decided to quit prior to the World Cup, and I think he could care less how that team did. They barely escaped past teams like Ecuador and Paraguay and couldn't beat Sweden. Then they lose to Portugal in the quarters on penalty kicks. I think Steve McLaren is going to be a great boost for them as the new 'gaffer,' and most of this squad is young and will be back. But England makes you wonder, what if...
The Good: Some absolutely brilliant play by some of the greatest players to ever play the game. Did you see the Maxi Rodriguez goal? Blasts the ball far post from the edge of the penalty area after playing the ball off his chest? Disgustingly amazing. Or Lahm blasting in the first goal of the tournament from the edge of the box? Epic. Goalkeepers are saying that this ball is more difficult for them to read, but that is making for some fantastic goals.
The Bad: The U.S. getting knocked out of the competition at the group phase. Granted, I think their group was the single toughest group in the event, but they had a real chance to progress going into the last game against Ghana. The U.S. was killed by cards and fouls, though, and crashed out early. I'm not going to cry for Bruce Arena's head like some pundits (ahem, Eric Wynalda), but something about the team needs to change. The philosophy, the lineup, the coach, something has to give. To lose a hard-fought game is one thing, but to lose while looking like you're playing a friendly is another (ahem, Czech Republic game).
The Ugly: Of course, it's the officiating. Sixteen cards in the Portugal/Netherlands game? Something is amiss there, that's just unreal. The ref must have thought he was being paid by the card. I'm tired of seeing cards and whistles blown; if this game gets any less-contact, it's going to be baseball. Let 'em play. And don't get me started on the US-Italy game. The Italy red card was a legit red card, the two US ones weren't. And that's unbiased.
Biggest Surprise: France. Where did they come from? Granted, the talent is there. Barthez, Henry, Viera, and the great Zidane, they should have cruised. But they didn't. They looked about as excited to be there as the U.S. did, and they barely made it out of the group stage, but then they pull out a result against high-flying Spain, and stun Brazil. I don't really care for France for reasons I don't know, but I have to give credit where it's due. They're hot at the right time.
Biggest Disappointment: England. OK, I realize that they got to the quarterfinals, but with the squad they have, they should have made the finals. They have incredible talent on that team, but I think they're horribly mis-managed. Their manager, Sven-Goran Eriksson, had decided to quit prior to the World Cup, and I think he could care less how that team did. They barely escaped past teams like Ecuador and Paraguay and couldn't beat Sweden. Then they lose to Portugal in the quarters on penalty kicks. I think Steve McLaren is going to be a great boost for them as the new 'gaffer,' and most of this squad is young and will be back. But England makes you wonder, what if...
15 Comments:
so you're the one american watching the world cup.
I've been watching it too. though brazil got beat by france, whats up with that shit?
hey, that's what makes it great. It's anybody's game now that Brazil's out.
Steve, and thanks to me, you can now sound like you're the only one watching it when it comes to friends or co-workers!
I haven't watched a single game, though I just found out that Italy won against Germany. They're my pick to win the Final too. France and Portugal are both going down!
haha, convenient timing for a pick Mac!
Yes, well, I just discovered that apparently Italy is the favored team to win now anyways (that's how little I know about soccer), so I'm considering rooting for the underdog France...but do I really want to root for France?
I haven't had a chance to watch all the games, although my friends are constantly nagging at me to join them. Here's my take on Il Buono, il brutto, il cattivo:
The Good: I have to agree that some goals have been nothing short of epic. Apparently the ball has less panels on it, which makes it behave like a knuckle ball when kicked properly, and it's easy to see the goalies' confusion in some replays.
The Bad: Officiating is a no-brainer here. Some awful calls that have killed games, and most refs have been far too card-happy. I've only seen a handful of matches (out of about a dozen) where I thought the refs did a decent job throughout.
The Ugly: Portugal. Seriously - how dirty can you play? This team has performed more dives than a chartered boat on the Great Barrier Reef. After today's result, I say good riddance to bad rubbish.
Biggest Surprise: Brazil, & particularly Ronaldinho, never delivered on the hype. After seeing so many highlight reels of Ronaldinho, I was disappointed to see him just pass off the ball within a few touches every time. Moreover, really selfish play at the front really crippled this team.
Biggest Disappointment: Ghana. Wow, what a tournament this Cinderella played. The 3-0 scoreline with Brazil didn't tell the story of the game at all, and were it not for the loss of their star player & some really bad officiating, they should have won handily. They were a lot of fun to watch.
It was explained to me in great terms why America will never dominate in soccer.
In a nut shell this is it.
(1) The American public, as a whole, is very critical of the acting aspect of soccer.
(2) As a result, the American soccer team (whether intentional or not I dunno) refuses to act.
(3) Since acting is such a HUGE part of the World Cup, Americans will always come up on the wrong side of the card and foul tally.
I think Brad can comment on that since he gets to watch US soccer played ofter at his new job. Brad, when was the last time you saw a Timber thrashing in pain on the pitch, only to be carried out in a stretcher then jump up 15 seconds later and run back on the pitch?
The fact it, soccer is a game where acting is encouraged and Americans will never respect that.
I like that explanation Failor!
Brad, rebuttal?
so soccer is like wrestling?
I definitely agree with Habib's comments, well put.
I think Failor is partially correct. I don't think that's the reason that Americans are disinterested in soccer. But I do also think that they haven't submitted to the 'diving'. Along with many other 'true' fans, we hate to see players flopping for a call and getting right back up. The stretcher and the fouls have really slowed down the 'beautiful game', and made it less beautiful. Habib is right, the Portugese are the worst, and I warned my co-workers before the World Cup that they would be. They just always do, especially Christiano Ronaldo (as much as it pains me to say that because he plays for ManYoo).
Anyway, my theory on soccer in America is that we're not good enough at it yet. Americans love a winner, and they'll embrace a sport when we're good enough to beat everyone else. We're not yet, so it's not followed. It's also a sport that's trying to create fans in this country when it's very likely those fans already spending their time and money on other sports. In Europe and elsewhere in the world, everybody's interested in soccer, so you're immersed in it from birth. Here, you only get exposed to it if your parents are hardcore fans or you don't like baseball, basketball or football.
Fortunately, though, I do see things getting better. We're a massive country that produces incredible athletes; it's only a matter of time before we win a World Cup. The talent pool here is just too large. I think we're already seeing it in the professional game in the States. The team I work for is second tier, but I expect them to hold their own against the second tier of English soccer on Saturday against Coventry City. Might not win, but they'll do well. It may be another 40 years before we hoist the World Cup, but I think it's inevitable that we will.
Now let's just hope we don't have to flop in the box to win it on a penalty kick...
When you are the greatest soccer player in the world, you are allowed to flop in the box
I agree with some of the previous comments made. The US will like soccer more once we start doing better. Look at this year compared to 2002. In 2002, there was no hype, but we did well, which led to all of the hype for this year.
Also, the flopping and officiating are too much. Soccer even has the NBA beat in these two categories, which I didn't think was possible. We want men, not actors and primadonnas to play sports.
The US seems to be missing the guy in the midfield that can control a game, like a Ronaldinho or a Zidane. Reyna sometimes could, but he was never consistently healthy it seemed. Also, the long ball way of playing doesn't work at the World Cup level, there needs to be more creativity offensively. And that will partly come from our guys playing overseas. I know MLS needs to grow and in order to do that, the guys need to play here, but if they want to get better as players, they need to play elsewhere.
oh my dear god in heaven, you gave 'about a boy' a star more than 'pulp fiction'? how do you sleep at night?!
Abercrombie a pris sa retraite en 1979 cascade devenir un etalon loud a Castleton Papal internuncio a Lexington, Kentucky (ou il a ete syndique de 3 millions [url=http://www.abercrombiedeutschlandeshop.com]abercrombie deutschland[/url] de dollars), en aidant a ramener la ligne Adios devant de la scene. En mai 2004, ses descendants ont gagne profit de $ 149 millions. Abercrombie engendre too de 1.700 poulains, 11 de ses descendants ont gagne profit de 1 million chacun [url=http://www.hollisterucosfrance.com]hollister france[/url] (y compris ArtsPlace, Harness Horse of the Year en 1992, qui a gagne 3.085.083 $), et 432 ont gagne supplement de $ 100.000. Parmi Abercrombie autres bien connus progeniture Sustenance Enregistrez-vous [url=http://www.hollistersalenukes.co.uk]hollister uk[/url], Armbro Emerson, Anniecrombie, Missisippen, Maverick, Barbel Kentucky, Goliath Bayama, Dontgetinmyway, Albert Albert et Armbro Dallas. Ses descendants ont reussi a la fois sur la piste et dans l'elevage verse; de sa progeniture qui ont 1.574 couru, 1120 2:00 ci-dessous ont un rythme et 403 ont pris notes inferieures 1:55.
Christian Louboutin 2011-12 automne et chaussures [url=http://www.hollisterfrancesoldae.com]hollister[/url] proceed hommes de l'hiver, sans scrupules medium de rivetage, non seulement ne se sentait pas d'inondation, ils se sentent [url=http://www.hollisterfrancece.com]hollister[/url] juste, peut-etre quand nous voyons Louboutin QI tombe a zero il! En particulier, j'ai vu une paire de chaussures leopard rouge et rivets, Dieu est vraiment beau a voir les chaussures que les hommes peuvent mourir heureux [url=http://www.abercrombieukandfitchs.co.uk]abercrombie uk[/url] perception concepteur suffisant cashier comprendre la inception et technique. Bien sur, Louboutin n'est pas la personne moyenne peut caretaker
Lors de la planification et de la construction, ils devaient être le Styx-classe nommée après quatre chiffres américains, le général Ulysses S. Ovation out of the closet, le général Robert E. Lee, l'amiral David Farragut et le général Stonewall [url=http://www.abercrombierfranceusolde.com]abercrombie france[/url] Jackson. Parce que les états-Unis était encore une puissance neutre, à ce moment-là, l'utilisation de ces noms auraient été peu diplomatique et ils ont été simplement appelé M1 à M4 avant de recevoir leur commencement finale names.The inclus [url=http://www.hollisterudeutschlande.com]hollister online shop[/url] un hydravion herd into repérer les armes à feu, mais il a été constaté que terrestre avions étaient appendix efficaces, comme les moniteurs, ils n'auraient jamais fonctionner dans la mer, et le stockage de l'hydravion au-dessus de [url=http://www.hollisterudeutschlande.com]hollister online shop[/url] la tourelle signifiait qu'il devait être retiré squall cats éviter talk up dommage, même s'il n'est pas nécessaire avant que les canons pouvaient tirer.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home